Government Surveillance: How ATF Uses Facial Recognition on Firearm Owners

Recent reports confirm that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has used facial recognition technology to track gun owners. Despite claims that ATF halted such practices in 2023, new evidence suggests otherwise.

LISTEN TO THIS ARTICLE

A growing number of reports indicate that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) has access to and utilizes facial recognition technology to identify and track firearm owners. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has confirmed ATF’s use of systems like Clearview AI and Vigilant Solutions, which compile billions of facial images from publicly available sources, including social media, news sites, and mugshots.

ATF’s Use of Facial Recognition Raises Constitutional Concerns

A 2021 GAO report found that ATF lacked proper oversight regarding its employees’ use of non-federal facial recognition systems. Employees initially used the technology without formal training, raising concerns about accuracy, potential misidentifications, and violations of civil liberties. GAO emphasized that government surveillance could have a “chilling effect” on the exercise of constitutional rights—including the Second Amendment.

Between October 2019 and March 2022, ATF reportedly conducted 549 facial recognition searches on gun owners. While ATF claimed in April 2023 that it had discontinued its use of such services, new information suggests otherwise.

Recent Reports Suggest ATF Continues Facial Recognition Searches

In July 2024, a report by Senator Ron Johnson detailed the attempted assassination of former President Trump in Butler, PA. Within the report, it was revealed that ATF had requested photos for facial recognition analysis—contradicting previous claims that the agency had ceased using the technology.

Concerns are growing over why ATF, a law enforcement agency focused on alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and explosives, would need access to facial recognition databases in the first place. Critics argue that such technology could be misused to track lawful gun owners, leading to potential violations of privacy and due process.

New Jersey Police Used Clearview AI to Identify Gun Owners

Further evidence suggests that ATF is not the only agency leveraging facial recognition against firearm owners. In New Jersey, where strict gun laws require firearm purchaser registration, police used Clearview AI to determine if suspects owned firearms before making arrests.

New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal later banned law enforcement agencies from using the software, citing concerns that it was “racist and inaccurate.” However, this case raises an alarming precedent—could other agencies follow suit in using facial recognition technology to monitor legal gun owners?

A National Gun Registry in the Making?

ATF has admitted to Congress that it maintains nearly one billion firearm records in a searchable digital registry. Although ATF claims this registry is not searchable by name, the agency intentionally disables search functionality within its system—meaning it could be easily re-enabled at any time.

With growing calls in Congress to fund “Law Enforcement Advanced Analytics,” many fear that ATF could soon combine facial recognition technology with its vast firearm registry to identify gun owners nationwide. This could set the stage for unprecedented government surveillance, allowing authorities to track lawful gun owners and their firearms with little oversight.

Gun rights advocates, including Gun Owners of America (GOA), warn that such developments could lead to registration, and historically, “registration always precedes confiscation.”

What’s Next?

With anti-gun politicians in Congress attempting to expand ATF’s powers through bills like the AIM Act, the concern is that ATF’s use of surveillance technology will only continue to grow. Gun rights organizations have vowed to challenge these efforts in both Congress and the courts to prevent any expansion of government tracking of lawful firearm owners.

As questions remain about the full extent of ATF’s facial recognition usage, one thing is clear—gun owners should remain vigilant and informed about government surveillance programs that could threaten their rights.

Safety Tip: If you value your privacy and Second Amendment rights, be aware of the information you share online, especially on social media. Many facial recognition databases collect images from public sources, making it easier for law enforcement and other entities to track individuals.