Advertisement
Bobcat

Armed Mother Shoots and Kills Bobcat in Her Own Backyard

Advertisement

ABILENE, TX — An Abilene resident shot and killed a bobcat in her backyard late last month, KTXS reports.

The woman was reportedly concerned for the safety of her child, who wasn’t there — and although I’d be looking out for my kid’s safety, too, the issue of legality is a muddy one.

According to KTXS:

An Abilene woman shot and killed a bobcat that was prowling around her backyard. Paula Kitchens said her daughter’s dog was barking up a storm Friday at the family’s home near Loop 322 and Oldham Lane. So, the daughter went outside to see what all the commotion was about and saw the bobcat.

The woman got her gun and the bobcat scurried up a tree. She fired one shot but missed.

The bobcat then leaped from the tree and she fired a second round, killing it. The woman’s 6-year-old son plays in the backyard and mom did not want to take any chances.

Now, that might sound straightforward, but here’s where things get tricky. As best as I can tell, what this woman did was illegal.

Disclaimer: I’m not from Texas. I’m just researching and reporting. If you know better — leave a comment and tell us about it!

Here’s what I’ve found, according to Fair & Fair, attorneys at law:

Advertisement

According to Section 9.22 of the Texas Penal Code,

“Conduct is justified if:

the actor reasonably believes the conduct is immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm;
the desirability and urgency of avoiding the harm clearly outweigh, according to ordinary standards of reasonableness, the harm sought to be prevented by the law proscribing the conduct; and
a legislative purpose to exclude the justification claimed for the conduct does not otherwise plainly appear.”

Breaking this down in the context of a person shooting an animal in response to an animal attack, a person may be legally justified in using force and/or deadly force against an attacking animal if that person has a reasonable belief that force and/or deadly force is immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm by the attacking animal.

Additionally:

Specifically, Texas Penal Code Section 42.092(d)(1) states that, “It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor had a reasonable fear of bodily injury to the actor or to another person by a dangerous wild animal as defined by Section 822.101, Health and Safety Code.

Looking to Section 822.101(4) of the Texas Health and Safety Code, “dangerous wild animals” include a: lion, tiger, ocelot, cougar, leopard, cheetah, jaguar, bobcats, lynx, serval, hyena, bears, coyote, jackal, baboon, chimpanzee, orangutan, gorilla, or any hybrid of one of the animals listed in this section.

If this woman just didn’t feel like having a bobcat around, is that a legal action? I have no idea. What do you think?

Please share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Categories: General
Advertisement
Advertisement
About John Falkenberg | View all posts by John Falkenberg

Falkenberg is a veteran writer and active voice in the gun community. He is passionate about not only ensuring that American citizens know their rights, but why they have those…

Falkenberg is a veteran writer and active voice in the gun community. He is passionate about not only ensuring that American citizens know their rights, but why they have those rights and what a gift it is to be in a country that acknowledges their God-given freedoms. His standard concealed carry rig is a Tristar T-100 in 9mm settled comfortably in a Quick Click and Carry Holster made by JM4 Tactical.

Posts – Below Author – Small Square 1 (150×150)Advertisement
Posts – Below Author – Small Square 2 (150×150)Advertisement
Posts – Below Author – Small Square 3 (150×150)Advertisement
Posts – Below Author – Small Square 4 (150×150)Advertisement