Texas flag capitol

UH Faculty: Steer Clear Of Certain Topics In Class If Students Are Armed


HOUSTON, TEXAS — The University of Houston is going completely the wrong direction in terms of advising its faculty to “drop” certain conversation topics in their curriculum. Ostensibly, this is because it is now legal for students and faculty to carry concealed firearms on campus. The real reason is that the despite the ban on concealed carry on campus being lifted, administrators and educators don’t want to educate themselves on what it means to be a law abiding concealed carrier.

Limiting the conversation that takes place at colleges and universities is dumb. The Houston Chronicle wrote up a very interesting article where they explore how the University of Houston is advising its faculty to censor themselves for fear of reprisals from a newly armed campus. This isn’t how concealed carry works. If educators and administrators educated themselves on precisely what it means to be directly responsible for your own safety, this wouldn’t be an issue. Instead of handling the reality that some of their students will now have a legal right to protect themselves on campus, they’re choosing to act like little children instead.

via the Houston Chronicle

“The diverse academic communities and free academic discourse are especially threatened by the presence of deadly weapons in teaching, research and living spaces.”

University of Houston faculty resolution


Classic “Ivory Tower Syndrome”.

All we can say to this is we truly feel bad for those paying literally tens of thousands of dollars a year to attend an institution of higher learning only to find out their faculty doesn’t have a clue on how the real world works.  It’s simple: deadly weapons already exist. It’s not some Pandora’s Box — they’ve already been engineered, invented, and distributed. Instead of waiting to be the next victim, you can now legally choose to protect yourself and your colleagues from harm. That’s a real world decision.

Instead, UH faculty are going to trim their curriculum and make woefully ignorant remarks about how being able to protect themselves is now somehow a threat. Good. I would also suggest people stop attending those classes or paying the ridiculous sums of money necessary to participate in a school that thinks so low of their own faculty and students as to attempt to shame them out of their legal rights.

It’s a reality that academia just don’t want to acknowledge: guns will exist regardless of whether or not you allow them. You might as well have the law abiding type carrying them versus just those who have no regard for safety or the law.

Categories: General, News, Politics
About G. Halek | View all posts by G. Halek

GH is a Marine Corps veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom and has served as a defense contractor in Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. His daily concealed carry handgun…

GH is a Marine Corps veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom and has served as a defense contractor in Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. His daily concealed carry handgun is a Glock 36 in a Lenwood Holsters Specter IWB or his CZ-75D PCR in an Alien Gear MOD holster.

Posts – Below Author – Small Square 1 (150×150)Advertisement
Posts – Below Author – Small Square 2 (150×150)Advertisement
Posts – Below Author – Small Square 3 (150×150)Advertisement
Posts – Below Author – Small Square 4 (150×150)Advertisement
  • MisterSandman

    This is simply the bigotry of the left on display.

  • Kwile

    Using that kind of thinking makes me wonder why there aren’t road rage shootings by 20 something year old carriers all the time. Carrying, to most people, has a moral responsibility that the vast majority of adults who go through the conscious choice (and for many the legal process) to carry a defensive weapon. To think something as petty as discussing certain ideals, beliefs, politics, etc. would set someone into a murderous rage is completely asinine.

  • t_reese

    This kind of thinking makes me think of a term I heard some years ago about a college graduate. The term was, ‘three piece suit with no brains’.
    The term can also be applied to faculty at our supposed institutions of higher learning.

  • Jesse Beaumont

    If it’s concealed, how will they know?

  • Jeff

    Uhh, right… so now the same lecture topics, which previously haven’t lead to fist-fights, knifing, or clubbing of objectors, will now foster gunning down objectors? And we call this higher learning?

  • Stephen Wilson

    The School Administration does not get it. I carry all the time, but I would never pull my gun unless my life or my families life were threatened with death or great grave bodily harm.